Hi, > After thinking a bit I suggest we (Ant, XDoclet, others???) go for the > following tags: > > class level - (both tasks and subtasks, any java bean class) > @bean.class > name="blabla" > display-name="Blah Blah" > exclude="true|false" > > (method level - setXXX methods only) > @bean.property > required="No. Default is abracadabra" > exclude="true|false" > > If Ant or XDoclet needs additional information, this can be specified > in other tags, but this proposal should be pretty complete for > the "bean" part of it I think. > > What do you think?
I like these new tags. If ant Ant or Xdoclet-specific stuff is involved then either introduce complementary @xdoclet:/@ant: tags or just add specific attributes to @bean tags as extension (like @ejb:finder jboss-query=""/etc we've been talking about recently). A side effect of these tags is that one of Rickard's dreams will come true. If you go back in time about two years you'll see Rickard proposing to generate javabean beaninfo classes from the bean impl class. Imho these tags can be used for that purpose too. PS: Hope you get a new computer sooner. A geek without a computer is like XDoclet without @tags :-D Ara. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Jabber Inc. Don't miss the IM event of the season | Special offer for OSDN members! JabConf 2002, Aug. 20-22, Keystone, CO http://www.jabberconf.com/osdn _______________________________________________ Xdoclet-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
