User: jeje
Date: 02/07/01 12:25:54
Modified: modules/jmx/src/xdoclet/modules/jmx JMXTagsHandler.java
Log:
Applied patch from Simone Bordet.
Revision Changes Path
1.5 +3 -5 xdoclet/modules/jmx/src/xdoclet/modules/jmx/JMXTagsHandler.java
Index: JMXTagsHandler.java
===================================================================
RCS file:
/cvsroot/xdoclet/xdoclet/modules/jmx/src/xdoclet/modules/jmx/JMXTagsHandler.java,v
retrieving revision 1.4
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -w -r1.4 -r1.5
--- JMXTagsHandler.java 12 Jun 2002 23:31:33 -0000 1.4
+++ JMXTagsHandler.java 1 Jul 2002 19:25:53 -0000 1.5
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
* @author Ara Abrahamian ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
* @created 31 January 2002
* @xdoclet.taghandler namespace="Jmx"
- * @version $Revision: 1.4 $
+ * @version $Revision: 1.5 $
* @todo attributes - XXX: Does this need to be synchronized?
* @todo ifIsGetterMethod, ifIsSetterMethod - TODO: There is a big
overlap here with stuff in ejb - have
* a look.
@@ -140,8 +140,7 @@
XTag[] tags =
getCurrentMethod().getDoc().getTags("jmx:managed-operation-parameter");
index = 0;
- // Aslak: should i really start with 1 and not 0? This deserves a comment.
- for (int i = 1; i < tags.length; i++) {
+ for (int i = 0; i < tags.length; i++) {
generate(template);
index++;
}
@@ -163,8 +162,7 @@
XTag[] tags =
getCurrentConstructor().getDoc().getTags("jmx:managed-constructor-parameter");
index = 0;
- // Aslak: should i really start with 1 and not 0? This deserves a comment.
- for (int i = 1; i < tags.length; i++) {
+ for (int i = 0; i < tags.length; i++) {
generate(template);
index++;
}
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Xdoclet-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
