Yep. Plain Log4j and nothing else for XDoclet 2.0.

Mathias

----- Original Message -----
From: "Erik Hatcher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Mathias Bogaert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, October 06, 2002 8:21 AM
Subject: Re: [Xdoclet-devel] Logging


> I've felt nothing but pain with Commons Logging.  Its probably just that
> I haven't spent a lot of time getting things in the right place, but
> then again, I shouldn't have to!
>
> What are the thoughts on switching to something else?  Back to Log4j?
>
> Mathias Bogaert wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I hate to bring it up (as I was the first to switch), but this
> > commons-logging isn't working very well.
> > Go read http://www.qos.ch/logging/thinkAgain.html ...maybe the XDoclet
team
> > should "think again" about this issue.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Mathias
> >
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> > Welcome to geek heaven.
> > http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> > _______________________________________________
> > Xdoclet-devel mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
> >
> >
>
>



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Xdoclet-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel

Reply via email to