FYI: (relevant to XDT-72) -----Original Message----- From: Hani Suleiman [mailto:hani@;formicary.net] Sent: 28. oktober 2002 20:14 To: Aslak Hellesoy Subject: Re: [Xdoclet-user] bean inheritance / home generation
FYI you can have xdoclet-devel get emailed by making it the project lead, and having all new issues go to the project lead by default. The issue I filed is: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/xdoclet/secure/ ViewIssue.jspa?key=XDT-72 On Monday, October 28, 2002, at 02:07 PM, Aslak Hellesoy wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> [mailto:xdoclet-user-admin@;lists.sourceforge.net]On Behalf Of Hani >> Suleiman >> Sent: 28. oktober 2002 19:40 >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: Re: [Xdoclet-user] bean inheritance / home generation >> >> >> +1 from me. >> >> Incidentally, I've submitted a patch a couple of weeks ago but it >> hasn't been merged in nor rejected (nor looked at, from what I can >> tell)...is jira actively monitored for patches and suchlike? >> > > Yes and no. I subscribed to JIRA's RSS feed using feedreader a week > ago, so > recently I have been notified about new issues. I have raised an issue > about > notifying xdoclet-devel upon new issues, but it hasn't been > implemented yet: > > http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/xdoclet/secure/ > ViewIssue.jspa?key=X > DT-56 > > I searched for your patch, but couldn't find it. Do you have a link, > Hani? > > Cheers, > Aslak > >> On Monday, October 28, 2002, at 01:34 PM, Aslak Hellesoy wrote: >> >>> >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Sebastien BLANC [mailto:Sebastien.Blanc@;alcatel.com] >>>> Sent: 28. oktober 2002 16:03 >>>> To: Aslak Hellesoy >>>> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> Subject: Re: [Xdoclet-user] bean inheritance / home generation >>>> >>>> >>>> Hello ! >>>> "XDoclet should generate a BHome that *does not* extend from AHome" >>>> currently with samples I get the following generation: >>>> public interface CustomerHome extends test.interfaces.PersonHome >>>> does that mean this is a bug in xdoclet ? >>>> thank you. >>>> seb. >>>> >>> >>> It's the way it currently works, and expected behaviour. I wouldn't >>> say it's >>> a bug, because it was designed to work this way. I'm only suggesting >>> it's >>> bad design, and asking the community if it thinks we should remove >>> inheritance from home interfaces. >>> >>> I think we should. What do you think? >>> >>> Aslak >>> >>>> Aslak Hellesoy wrote: >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------- >>> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek >>> Welcome to geek heaven. >>> http://thinkgeek.com/sf >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Xdoclet-user mailing list >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user >>> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek >> Welcome to geek heaven. >> http://thinkgeek.com/sf >> _______________________________________________ >> Xdoclet-user mailing list >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Xdoclet-user mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user > ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Xdoclet-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
