> Thanks. What does it mean it was deprecated? > It means that both are still supported and both are > threaed equally? > It does not metter for XDoclet engine if I type > ejb.ejb-ref or ejb:ejb-ref?
You got it. Actually all tags are converted internally from : to . form. > Simply they are used in old sources ( ejb-ref.xdt) > I am writing module for Borland Enterprise Server. > I am trying to use "new" syntax - ejb.xxx. > but it seems that this one is not working for me. > I suppose that this is becouse of this problem but > might be that I have a > problem somewhere else Can you imagine what amount of work would be to change all templates? :) And BAS support may be buggy as well - it's surely not so widely used as jboss / weblogic - so less feedback from users. If you believe that there is an error, raise issue in JIRA. regards, ===== Konstantin Priblouda ( ko5tik ) Freelance Software developer < http://www.pribluda.de > < play java games -> http://www.yook.de > < render charts online -> http://www.pribluda.de/povray/ > __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance Computing Channel http://hpc.devchannel.org/ _______________________________________________ Xdoclet-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
