The following comment has been added to this issue:
Author: Marcus Brito
Created: Wed, 1 Jan 2003 11:51 PM
Body:
Oh, JIRA needs more liking relationships. Anyway, this issue has something to do with
XDT-202. Take a look at it.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
View the issue:
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/xdoclet/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=XDT-220
Here is an overview of the issue:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: XDT-220
Summary: <utilobject> shouldn't default to neither COMP_NAME nor JNDI_NAME
Type: Improvement
Status: Assigned
Priority: Major
Time Spent: Unknown
Estimate: 0 minutes
Project: XDoclet
Component: EJB Module
Fix For: 1.2
Versions:
1.1.2
1.2 Beta 1
1.2 Beta 2
Assignee: xdoclet-devel (Use for new issues)
Reporter: Marcus Brito
Created: Wed, 1 Jan 2003 11:49 PM
Updated: Wed, 1 Jan 2003 11:49 PM
Description:
The problem with COMP_NAME lookups in Util Object's has generated quite some traffic
in the mailing list. Are we right defaulting to use logical lookups as the default in
Util Object classes? Would we be right to use physical lookups instead?
We can't tell it. I propose we shouldn't assume any default and make the kind
parameter to <utilobject> task mandatory. That way we avoid the common "util object
can't find my bean!" pitfall.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
JIRA INFORMATION:
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/xdoclet/Administrators.jspa
If you want more information on JIRA, or have a bug to report see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Xdoclet-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
