--- Anatol Pomozov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > XDoclet and generama are pretty stable. > But there is a lot of space where this projects can > be developed. I > wish Generama have several addition features > (validation and 'force > generation' some of them). But seems that Generama > developers are > inactive.
Well, I'm one of them. So the blame is on me too. I will try to find a time this evening to apply your patches and release fresh snapshot. Plugins could use fresh snapshots too.... > OK. I see. But what about merging xdoclet.codehaus > and xdoclet-plugins > project?? Please dont imagine me as fan of merging > projects but I > think that code which is tightly cooperated must be > kept in single > place. In this case we eliminate 1 jira, 2 > maillists, 1 repository. > Also we can ask codehaus maintainers to move our > repository to > Subversion. It is more diffucult to add developers to codehaus, than to SF project. that's why SF was choosen for the plugins. regards, ----[ Konstantin Pribluda ( ko5tik ) ]---------------- ... Auf der Suche nach einen Projekt in Rhein-Main ab 18.4.2005 ----[ http://www.pribluda.de ]------------------------ __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes Want to be the first software developer in space? Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7412&alloc_id=16344&op=click _______________________________________________ xdoclet-plugins-interest mailing list xdoclet-plugins-interest@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-plugins-interest
