Hello list
Anyone care to comment :)Diogo ----------------------------------- Diogo Bacelar Quintela EF - Tecnologias de Informação, Lda. Av. António Serpa, 26 - 4º Dto. 1050-027 Lisboa, Portugal Tel: (+351) 217 827 800 Fax: (+351) 217 827 830 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP: 0xF51A5AB9 > -----Original Message----- > From: Ryan Heaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: quinta-feira, 22 de Dezembro de 2005 18:44 > To: 'Jakarta Commons Developers List'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [jelly][vote] APT tag library > > I have created a JIRA issue with a comprehensive description, and I've > included some examples on what this new tag library can do. > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JELLY-225 > > Comments would be appreciated. > > -Ryan > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Paul Libbrecht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 2:10 PM > > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > > Subject: Re: [jelly][vote] APT tag library > > > > Ryan, > > > > The idea of making it a jira issue is that it's a place you can post > > to... and that people can see and comment on. > > I'd put there a tag-library similarly packaged to others in > > jelly/jelly-tags/. > > > > How does it sound ? > > > > paul > > > > Ryan Heaton wrote: > > > I have not posted a jira issue. I was not aware that was needed. > > > > > > You'll have to be patient with me, I really have no idea > > how the process to add a component works. I would be happy to proceed > > > through whatever formal process has been established. If > > someone could explain to me what needs to happen, I'd be > > happy to drive > > > it. > > > > > > I don't even mind if the component isn't wanted in the > > commons, I'll put it in sourceforge otherwise. From where I > > stand, I've got > > > something cool, I believe it will be very useful to many > > people, and if you want it as part of jelly, I'm willing to > > submit it and > > > even to maintain it. > > > > > > Please advise. > > > > > > -Ryan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > > >> From: Paul Libbrecht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 2:17 AM > > >> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > > >> Subject: Re: [jelly][vote] APT tag library > > >> > > >> I'm slowly catching up on this. > > >> Maybe we need to have life with Ryan a bit longer before > > becoming a > > >> committer. > > >> In order to send a fully fledged component proposal, Ryan, > > dare I ask > > >> whether you've posted a jira issue already ? > > >> This is really needed for all to look at. > > >> > > >> thanks > > >> > > >> paul > > >> > > >> robert burrell donkin wrote: > > >> > > >>> On Thu, 2005-12-15 at 09:48 -0700, Ryan Heaton wrote: > > >>> > > >>> > > >>>> I'm adjusting the thread subject to reflect the fact that > > >>>> > > >> there is a vote going on for two things: > > >> > > >>>> 1. Acceptance of the new APT tag library (described below) > > >>>> 2. Acceptance of me as a committer to support the new apt > > >>>> > > >> tag library, if it gets accepted. > > >> > > >>>> So far, I have recorded three people voting positive for > > >>>> > > >> both proposals: > > >> > > >>>> Dion Gillard > > >>>> Hans Gilde > > >>>> Paul Libbrecht > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>> hi ryan > > >>> > > >>> (sorry to have to start being a little legalistic...) > > >>> > > >>> i know that this can be a little confusing but there are votes and > > >>> VOTEs... > > >>> > > >>> both of these need to be official ASF votes. these need > > >>> > > >> more formality > > >> > > >>> that just vague +1's against your proposal. the subject > > >>> > > >> should be [VOTE] > > >> > > >>> (jelly isn't necessary since VOTEs are commons-wide and may > > >>> > > >> result in > > >> > > >>> some filters not recognising your post as a vote thread). > > >>> > > >>> we're really only getting up to speed with the new processes for > > >>> accepting code which is not original so you might need a little > > >>> patience. so, apologies in advance... > > >>> > > >>> i'm not sure there's any consensus about the best way to approach > > >>> software grants but i'd expect to understand the provinence of the > > >>> donated code before i'd be willing to +1. i'd also expect a jelly > > >>> committer to start the VOTE thread. > > >>> > > >>> it's not really possible to have conditional approval for a > > >>> > > >> committer > > >> > > >>> and it's poor netiquette to nominate yourself as a committer. > > >>> > > >>> > > >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
