The presence/absense of those tags shouldn't affect the contents of the generated classes, except for the class (interface) name. When you run xdoclet, what is the output?
cheers dim On Mon, 8 Oct 2001, tek1 wrote: > i'm double-checking some things, but i have a feeling that my generated > files are not extending javax.ejb.EJBLocalObject and javax.ejb.EJBLocalHome > because i have the below xdoclet class-level tag declared in my .java file: > > @ejb:interface remote-class="hellomdb.server.msg.Msg" > > i will try removing this tag and/or replacing it with: > > @ejb:interface local-class="hellomdb.server.msg.MsgLocal" > > and see what happens. > > > > > At 08:18 01/10/09 +1000, Dmitri Colebatch wrote: > >The template has the javax.ejb.EJBLocalObject in it. so it seems very odd > >behaviour. Could you post the rest of your build file and bean comments? > > > >cheers > >dim > > > >On Mon, 8 Oct 2001, tek1 wrote: > > > > > according to the documentation, the default for the class-level tag for > > > "@ejb:home" and "@ejb:interface"'s "local-extends" tag is > > > "javax.ejb.EJBLocalObject". > > > > > > however, when i check the generated ejb files, the interface extends > > > javax.ejb.EJBObject and the home class extends javax.ejb.EJBHome. > > > > > > according to the default, shouldn't the interface and home extend > > > javax.ejb.EJBLocalObject and javax.ejb.EJBLocalHome? > > > > > > in my ant build.xml file, i'm specifying the 2.0 for the ejb spec... > > > > > > <ejbdoclet ejbspec="2.0"> > > > > > > > > > thx... :) > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Xdoclet-user mailing list > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Xdoclet-user mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user > _______________________________________________ Xdoclet-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user
