Hi, > Hey
> It seems as though the current generated BMP layer always calls > ejbStore() on the superclass regardless of the dirty flag. > Is this intentional? No, I did merge the CMP and BMP .j to avoid duplicate code. I made the quick assumption that CMP was better and take it its .j content to build the common .j. Now I understand that BMP was better in some place and ejbStore is the perfect example ;) > Are we then supposed to check explicitly in our own code for isDirty? I think your option is better than letting the user having to handling that. I can not think of a good example where a user could want to run ejbStore when dirty is false, isModified() is there to avoid this call in CMP anyway. > Would there be a problem with reinstating the isDirty check? I will correct that. > Not a big deal, but I'm curious about this change. The last version of > XDoclet I used had an if-statement on the dirty flag before calling > super.ejbStore(), and I would prefer that. > /Rickard Vincent _______________________________________________ Xdoclet-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user
