Hi everybody, OK, I'm *almost back*, after a relatively long a hard illness :-(
We'll see, I'll happily join it if something doesn't go wrong. I believe we can help them with our experience, specially the issues raised by inheriting or not inheriting attributes, validation of tags (part of the xtags subproject), and basically defining good attributes! You know we've defined 100's of @tags ;-) You should really go into it to discover kind of questions that I've been faced with, not a piece of cake really. I knew this would happen, I've said it a year ago. It was even clearer to me recently when I looked at weblogic workshop. They use exactly the same @tag format (and amazing though it has a JDK1.4 inside, but they use @jws:blabla format which makes 1.4's javadoc feel bad! Workshop is more compatible with xdoclet than Cedric's ejbgen too!!). Was XDoclet going to act as a semi-jsr on its own? No. I know we've been standardizing all over the time, even some non-standard tags (@ejb:persistence for example). It's definitely good news for java. The next step.... Cheers, Ara. > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:xdoclet-user- > [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of J. Matthew Pryor > Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 4:32 AM > To: Dmitri Colebatch; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [Xdoclet-user] Java meta-data JSR from Sun > > Individuals can be on an expert panel for sure, there are company & > individual options > > There are some legal agreements to sign, but I don't think they are too > onerous. > > I am on the JSR-159 expert panel, I am on associated with my employer and > in > that case there was a fee to pay, I am not sure about the fee for > individual > experts > > Definitely give it a go if you are up for it, this JSR has to have good > input from the xdoclet team > > jmp > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dmitri > > Colebatch > > Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 10:42 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: [Xdoclet-user] Java meta-data JSR from Sun > > > > > > wow... > > > > Ara - you mentioned this almost a year ago.... I have no idea > > what is involved in being a member of an expert group, but I would > > wholeheartedly support your participation in this JSR. > > > > From the points there, it is exactly XDoclet isn't it.... afaik, > > no other 'code annotation tools' provide the framework that XDoclet > > does - includeing the 'Definition of a runtime delivery format > > for metadata and of runtime APIs so that tools and libraries can > > accesss metadata information at deployment time and at runtime'. > > > > cheers > > dim > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "J. Matthew Pryor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 10:32 AM > > Subject: [Xdoclet-user] Java meta-data JSR from Sun > > > > > > > Did people see this ? > > > > > > Sun has submitted a JSR for including annotations (metadata) in > > Java source > > > > > > http://www.jcp.org/jsr/detail/175.jsp > > > > > > No specific mention of xdoclet, but it seems like there must be > > an overlap > > > > > > jmp > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Xdoclet-user mailing list > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Xdoclet-user mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Xdoclet-user mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Xdoclet-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user
