It sounds like a bug. Please file it as a bug report and enclose the associated javadoc section of your bean. you can assign it to me (rinkrank)
Thanks in advance, /Aslak > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Michael > Elizarov > Sent: 18. april 2002 23:04 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Xdoclet-user] transactional attribute on local interface > > > I have a bunch of entity beans with only local interface, which are > facaded by session bean(s) with remote. If I put transaction type tag on > locally accessible bean methods, then XDoclet generates something like > this in ejb-jar.xml: > > <container-transaction > > <method > > <ejb-name>UnitOfMeasure</ejb-name> > <method-intf>Remote</method-intf> > <method-name>update</method-name> > <method-params> > > <method-param>com.moveitonline.framework.model.BaseObject</method-param> > </method-params> > </method> > <trans-attribute>Required</trans-attribute> > </container-transaction> > > Note that method-intf is Remote. Then I run ejbc and it chokes saying: > [java] ERROR: Error from ejbc: Unable to set the transaction > attribute for method > "update(com.moveitonline.framework.model.BaseObject)". No matching > method could be found. Please verify the method signature specified in > the ejb-jar.xml file matches that of your EJB. > [java] ERROR: ejbc found errors > > I can edit ejb-xml.jar manually and get desired results (both local and > remote methods with appropriate transaction attributes), but that's not > lot of fun... Bug? > > Regards, > Michael Elizarov > > > _______________________________________________ > Xdoclet-user mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user _______________________________________________ Xdoclet-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user
