> >As I understand it, what Lanh is asking for is this:
> >
> > public AdministratorData( AdministratorData otherData )
> > {
> > super(otherData);
> > ...
> > }
> >
> >yes?
> >
> >I can see the argument for that? anyone else, thoughts?
>
> Oh, yes. Of course. That seems very reasonable, but it would require the
> base class to define a copy constructor. Is that a too hard requirement?
not sure what you mean by a copy constructor, you mean taking defensive copies? I
wouldn't see that we'd need to go that far...
cheers
dim
_______________________________________________
Xdoclet-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user
