Oops! My latest changes screwed it again :-) I'll fix it. Ara.
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:xdoclet-user- > [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Paul Cantrell > Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 1:00 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Xdoclet-user] Method param types not fully qualified in DD? > > With the latest CVS, my method parameter types aren't getting > fully qualified in ejb-jar.xml -- in other words, I should get > this: > > <container-transaction > > <method > > ... > <method-param>java.lang.String</method-param> > ... > </method> > <trans-attribute>Required</trans-attribute> > </container-transaction> > > ...but I'm seeing this instead: > > <container-transaction > > <method > > ... > <method-param>String</method-param> > ... > </method> > <trans-attribute>Required</trans-attribute> > </container-transaction> > > This screws up JBoss 3.0.0, which apparently does not recognize > "String" and "java.lang.String" as being the same, and thus > misses all my method-level transaction attributes. > > Is this a known problem? Is there something I might be doing > wrong here? > > Paul > > _____________________________________________________________________ > "At the level of bits, censorship and digital-rights management are > technologically identical." Hal R. Varian, _The New York Times_ > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Oh, it's good to be a geek. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Xdoclet-user mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Oh, it's good to be a geek. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Xdoclet-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user
