> I'd strongly recommend just using xdoclet for the ejbs and not
> bothering with the web portion (ie, leave it as it is)
>
> In my experience, it's not worth having xdoclet generate the web.xml
> file as it's really not that much of a big deal. It makes sense in the
> case of ejbs are you need so many other files created.

I'd like to offer an alternate suggestion - use it.  I suppose depends on
how you're doing things, but if you have servlets/struts/webwork classes,
then the web.xml generation will be very handy... if your web tier uses only
JSPs then I suppose there's probably not that much benefit from it (although
I'd also recommend changing your design in that case).

cheers
dim

>
> On Monday, October 7, 2002, at 06:01  PM, Keith wrote:
>
> > Hi:
> >   I have a current project that I am trying to switch over to xdoclet.
> > I
> > have jsps and EJBs in this project. However, I still need a web.xml
> > and a
> > vendor-web.xml to be able to reference all the EJBs from the jsp. What
> > would
> > be your advise on approaching this problem?
> >
> > Thanks
> > keith
> >
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> > Welcome to geek heaven.
> > http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> > _______________________________________________
> > Xdoclet-user mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user
> >
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> Xdoclet-user mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user
>



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Xdoclet-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user

Reply via email to