..at least i think

The following code generates
<relation-table-mapping>
</relation-table-mapping>
instead of
<relation-table-mapping>
<table-name>ca_rel</table-name>
</relation-table-mapping>

/**
* This is a uni-directional one-to-many relationship CMR method
*
* @return a collection of related com.wingstech.webappointments.interfaces.ActivityLocal.
* @ejb.interface-method
* view-type="local"
* @ejb.relation
* name="centers-activity"
* role-name="center-has-activity"
* @jboss.relation-mapping
* style="relation-table"
* @jboss.relation-table
* table-name="ca_rel" * create-table=""
* remove-table=""
* @jboss.relation
* fk-constraint="true"
* fk-column="code"
* related-pk-field="code"
*/
public abstract java.util.Collection getActivities();

/**
* Sets a related collection of com.wingstech.webappointments.interfaces.ActivityLocal
*
* @param pActivities The related collection of com.wingstech.webappointments.interfaces.ActivityLocal to set
* @ejb.interface-method
* view-type="local"
* @param calendar the new CMR value
*/
public abstract void setActivities(java.util.Collection pActivities);





-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?sunm0004en
_______________________________________________
Xdoclet-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user

Reply via email to