I don't quite understand the question. We're happily using JUnit testing by calling our session beans through our "proxy" object (a custom <utilobject> template) which uses the generated home/remote interfaces.

There is no difference in how our JUnit tests interface with the generated code than how our production code interfaces with it.

Can you clarify your question more or provide an example of what you're after?

Erik


SainTiss wrote:
Hi,

Is there an example somewhere of a JUnit test written with the help of
the JUnit ant task, on some XDoclet generated EJB code?

Thanks

Hans




-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Xdoclet-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user

Reply via email to