By the way - I only use package substitution by substituting all packages from, for example, com.x.y.ejb to com.x.y.object.

I haven't tried going from com.x.y.object.ejb to com.x.y.object ...

Barry Fortune wrote:

I am using a value object with package substitution as in:

<valueobject pattern="{0}">
<packageSubstitution packages="object.ejb" substituteWith="object"/>
</valueobject>

The original bean is in the package com.x.y.object.ejb
However the package for Value object is : com.x.y.object.com.x.y.object.ejb
instead of com.x.y.object
Can anyone confirm this.

I also tried packages="ejb" and substitueWith="" but that gives the same effect.


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld http://www.vasoftware.com
_______________________________________________
xdoclet-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user





-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
_______________________________________________
xdoclet-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user

Reply via email to