Hi Aslak, > 1) On the @tag level, since we plan to change (simplify) tags > considerably. > Less tags. > 2) On the Ant level, since the invocation mechanism will be slightly > different.
I'm using XDoclet since early days so I would appricate simpified tasks. :-) Mostly you can write simple search&replace programs so this souldn't be so painfully. With Ant I'm not so sure. > On the Ant level I don't think it would be worthwhile to > write a migration > tool, but rather a migration *doc*. There won't be that much > to migrate from > the Ant scripts. But other differnt task you have not under control could be problematic. Anyway I'm looking forward to it. Just a question: I'm dreaming of a XMIDoclet. Shoud't be XGG able to generate the template file for it? Assume I'm start writing a XMIDoclet would you write it for XDoclet2 or 1.2.2? How hard would be the emigration? Would the CVS XDoclet2 stuff already a working basis for such a tool? Thx Toby ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com _______________________________________________ xdoclet-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user
