On Wed, 2003-03-19 at 17:04, Ingo Bruell wrote: > Marcus Brito has closed the issue, but i have no solution for the > problem. I do not know what he meant with "this is somewhat > incomplete" and "that the accessor is not so confused".
Well, I'm not absolutely sure what is meant by "value-object Accessor in CMP class confused" (the issue's subject), never mind the subsequent comments. However, the code sample you gave in the issue has * @ejb.value-object * compose="de.oblgmbh.wb.meta.interfaces.AdresseValue" * compose-name="SterbeOrtValue" * members="de.oblgmbh.wb.meta.interfaces.Adresse" * members-name="SterbeOrt" * relation="external" As I understand it, if you're not using type="Collection" (or Set), then there's no need for the members and members-name parameters. So I guess he's closing it as Incomplete as there's no demonstrable bug, just dodgy parameters. Garbage in, garbage out... Did you try it without the members and members-name parameters, like Marcus suggested on 7th Feb? Andrew. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Does your code think in ink? You could win a Tablet PC. Get a free Tablet PC hat just for playing. What are you waiting for? http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?micr5043en _______________________________________________ xdoclet-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user
