Hi David,
That's exactly what indexes are for, and they are created/mantained "automatically" by your database. In fact, if you created such a table you would be duplicating information, as you would be repeating the original table key in n rows of your "relationship table" AND repeating the other key. It would be like an N-M relationship.
Graphically, something like... ( Table A and Table B, 1-N from A to B):
Table A
-------
A1, AData_1, ...
A2, AData_2, ...


Table B
-------
B1, BData_1,..., A1
B2, BData_2,..., A1
B3, BData_3,..., A1
B4, BData_4,..., A2

with an extra table...

Table A
-------
A1, AData_1, ...
A2, AData_2, ...

Table B
-------
B1, BData_1,...
B2, BData_2,...
B3, BData_3,...
B4, BData_4,...

Table A_B
-------
B1, A1
B2, A1
B3, A1
B4, A2

If you don't have any index on table B using the foreign key of table A, you might get some performance improvement but it is in this case where one would have "unnecessary data". I always recommend and use indexes and just two tables but...
Regards,
D.



David Nielsen escribi�:


As i undestand it:
If I do it bidirectional in my example i would insert a row pr.
mailmessage for each user i sent it to, it would gime a lot of similar
mailmessages, with just the toUsers field changed, if you have a
unidirectional relation with a relation table you would only have one
row in mailmessages with the actual message and a lot of foreign key in
the relation table thar points at this one message.
so you would not have a lot of unnessesary data, and the database woulnd
grow as big.
Im not a pro database, but i would think it would give me some
performance, if i just have a relation table which only contains keys to
my actual tables.


Regards, David


On Thu, 2003-10-02 at 12:30, Daniel L�pez wrote:

Hi,
Do you really need an extra table when creating a unidirectional 1-n relationship? I've always used bidirectional relationships so I've never tried, but I don't see the reason why unidirectional ones would require such an extra table. May be I did not understand the statement below.
Cheers,
D.


Edward Kenworthy escribi�:

This is a unidirectional 1:m so yes you do need a relationship table.

... //snipped





------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ xdoclet-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user

Reply via email to