--- Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [no, not the @javabean one on the site, I think]
>
> Is there anything that let's me do:
>
> public class Person {
>
> /**
> * @read
> * @write
> */
> String name;
>
> }
>
>
> If not, is there a technical reason why not? ie)
> doclet's only work
> properly on methods or something?
There is no technical reason. I's just not
implemented yet.
But ou can write your own template, or extend
existing....
For new development you shall consider writing
xdoclet2 plugin.
It will work faster, and is easier.
( but very very alpha... )
> I'd intend to have some other setting to specify
> whether that generates
> out an interface, abstract and concrete, or just a
> concrete.
> The generated class would have to match the
> inheritence structure of the
> bean it's running on, ie) Person extends Thing, so
> the generated code
> would have to match such a thing. Would this cause
> an xdoclet problem?
>
may be ...
regards,
=====
----[ Konstantin Pribluda ( ko5tik ) ]----------------
Zu Verstärkung meines Teams suche ich ab Sofort einen
Softwareentwickler[In] für die Festanstellung.
Arbeitsort: Mainz
Skills: Programieren, Kentnisse in OpenSource-Bereich
----[ http://www.pribluda.de ]------------------------
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes
http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin.
Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click
_______________________________________________
xdoclet-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-user
