On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 6:32 PM, George Shuklin <george.shuk...@gmail.com>wrote:

> Good day.
>
> I still do not understand current situation with XCP updates and git tree.
> I understand there is a lots of stuff happens between code and rpm, and it
> consume lot of time of many guys.
>
> But few questions about current XCP code and fixes...
>
> 1) which branch contains current state of xapi for XCP 1.6?
> remotes/origin/tampa-lcm from github?
> 2) Is tampa-lcm branch HEAD the current stable for XenServer?
> 3) Can it safely be compiled and installed to product environment?
>
> I especially concern about 3rd, because I don't want to suddenly get batch
> of XenServers instead current product XCP pool.
>
> I don't ask about 'when you gonna compile them to RPMs for me', but there
> is a mist around git branches, XCP and XenServer relationship.
> We finally got human resources to dig inside xapi (and plans to publish
> our improvements/features), but we need to know, what exactly  to patch.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
Tampa is the xapi branch which was shipped with XCP1.6 and tampa-lcm is
their Life Cycle Management branch.
I tried to compare each tag with current xapi-0.2-5217.src.rpm but they all
are different. Tampa-lcm has minimal differences with 1.6 code but does not
look like the exact code.

- Rushikesh



> ______________________________**_________________
> Xen-api mailing list
> Xen-api@lists.xen.org
> http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/**mailman/listinfo/xen-api<http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-api>
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-api mailing list
Xen-api@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-api

Reply via email to