Is there any direct download link to that xs-tools.iso or the pv driver .exe file? I'm still unable to apply the XS61E010 hotfix. This is the last try before I switch back to XCP 1.1, because I already compiled i350's driver for it.

On 19/03/2013 4:08 PM, hook wrote:

> I already use "Citrix Tools for Virtual Machines" for my W2K3R2 VM which is XS61 Legacy Tools. But still hang when I try to copy very big files (>5GB). > I could not manage to apply XS61E010 patch. So I use "xenlegacy.exe" signed by Citrix Systems Inc. at 24 November 2012. I took that file from XCP 1.6 iso, folder client_install.
> Is it the same file?
>
No, they dos not.

Problem with various Windows VMs exactly in */_"xenlegacy.exe" signed by Citrix Systems Inc. at 24 November 2012_/* Just to check issue reduce number of vCPU to 1 in mentioned VM and try copy process again. Everything should work fine... and slow...

So, you have to get xen-tools from XS61E010 hotfix. It is different version - just renamed XS 60Exx hotfix.

2013/3/19 Agi Subagio <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>

    Quote from CTX135009:


          How Can I Check Whether My VM is Running Legacy or Standard
          Tools?

    To check what Tools a Windows VM is running, click
    the*Start*button, then*Control Panel*, then (depending on the
    version of Windows)*Add/Remove Programs*, or*Programs and
    Features*, or*Uninstall a Program*. If "Citrix Tools for Virtual
    machines" is listed the Legacy Tools are installed. If "Windows
    Driver Package Citrix Systems Inc. (xenbus) System" is listed then
    the Standard Tools are installed.


    I already use "Citrix Tools for Virtual Machines" for my W2K3R2 VM
    which is XS61 Legacy Tools. But still hang when I try to copy very
    big files (>5GB).
    I could not manage to apply XS61E010 patch. So I use
    "xenlegacy.exe" signed by Citrix Systems Inc. at 24 November 2012.
    I took that file from XCP 1.6 iso, folder client_install.
    Is it the same file?

    I think I'm going back to XCP 1.1 until XCP 2.0 is out. It's much
    easier to prepare i350 driver compilation then patching XCP 1.6 VM.

    On 19/03/2013 2:16 PM, hook wrote:
    AFAIK, You can't install XS61E009 Update on to XCP 1.6. I've
    already asked here about the way to implement binary update from
    Citrix to XCP, but no luck.

    So you just would install lecacy xen-tools (or XS61E010) to your
    Windows system to avoid known bugs in some configuration.


    2013/3/19 Agi Subagio <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>

        Hi,

        I tried to digest the posts in the thread and looked into
        this Citrix's KB:
        http://support.citrix.com/article/CTX135099
        http://support.citrix.com/article/CTX136252
        http://support.citrix.com/article/CTX136253

        Let me clarify, I must doing these steps:
        - install XCP 1.6 from the beginning
        - install hotfix XS61E009 and hotfix XS61E010, then I have
        two version of xs-tools iso in my host (standard and legacy)
        - import W2K3R2 VM
        - make sure there is no XCP 1.1 Standard Tools or XCP 1.6
        Standard Tools in it
        - install XS61E010 Legacy Tools into W2K3R2 VM
        - and I have to do this on each W2K3R2 VM

        I would try first.

        regards,
        Agi


        On 18/03/2013 8:53 PM, Denis Cardon wrote:

            Hi Agi,

                Thanks for reply... I will read it first.
                Do you mean p2v drivers is in xs-tools.iso?
                fyi, all of my W2K3 VMs use 2-4 VCPUs.


            Yes that's it, you should re-install the pv driver with a
            recent enough build of xs-tools.iso.

            I have a dozen win2k3 running fine on XCP 1.6, so "it
            should work"(tm) for you too! In the citrix thread I sent
            you, you can find the exact build that address this issue.

            The recompilation of a driver is not very hard either
            once you got used to it, but it would be a pity not to
            get on with XCP1.6, the Citrix team did a tremendous work
            on this release.

            Cheers,

            Denis


                On 18/03/2013 5:04 PM, Denis Cardon wrote:

                    Hi Agi,

                    > I have a new server with onboard Intel i350
                    Gigabit Ethernet, but XCP

                        1.1 did not detect that card. Previously I
                        install XCP 1.6 on it, but my
                        VM (Windows) always hang randomly and hard to
                        reboot/shutdown via
                        XenCenter, so I want to use XCP 1.1 to that
                        server. How to compile
                        igb-4.1.2.tar.gz source code for XCP 1.1?


                    I had a issue recently with a win2k WM crashing
                    after upgrade to
                    XCP1.6. There has been an issue with win2k win2k3
                    vms that is
                    explained in the post below (long post).

                    
http://forums.citrix.com/thread.jspa?threadID=314477&start=105&tstart=0

                    Summary :
                    * For win2k3 and above vms, upgrade p2v drivers.
                    * For win2k vms, short workaround is to have only
                    one vcpus in the VM.
                    (indeed, the new driver does not want to install
                    on win2k per
                    citrix/windows EOL policy). If you definitly need
                    more than one vcpus
                    in your win2k vm, you'll have to tweak a little
                    more I guess.

                    If you still want to recompile, you have to
                    install kernel headers
                    from source iso, enable centos repo, install
                    build tools and compile
                    your driver. But I'd recommend to give one more
                    try to XCP 1.6.

                    Cheers,

                    Denis







-- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content
        by MBS MailScanner, and is believed to be clean and safe.


        _______________________________________________
        Xen-api mailing list
        [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
        http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-api




-- WBR

    Sergey Kruchatov

-- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MBS MailScanner, and is believed to be clean and safe.


-- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content
    by MBS MailScanner, and is believed to be clean and safe.

    _______________________________________________
    Xen-api mailing list
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-api




--
WBR

Sergey Kruchatov

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content
by MBS MailScanner, and is believed to be clean and safe.


--
This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content
by MBS MailScanner, and is believed to be clean and safe.

_______________________________________________
Xen-api mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-api

Reply via email to