Hi, Julian wrote: ... > I've thought for a while that it > would be beneficial to store more metadata persistently within the SR > itself, to make it more portable and to overcome synchronisation issues > like this. This was the original intention for the MGT volume in LVHD.
It would be great to store stuff like VDI name_labels and VM metadata snapshots for DR. We should definitely do some more thinking about this. Dave wrote (about the snapshot VDI fields) ... > > We should consider allowing the backend to read/write these fields. > > There's already precedent for that kind of thing: the backend can call > > VDI.set_virtual_size but it looks read/only to everyone else. > > > I would be strongly in favour of this also. Great. I think once we've branched for the next release we could make this happen in XCP unstable. Cheers, Dave _______________________________________________ xen-api mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-api
