Thanks Mike. I'll study on remus and will see what can be done. >From reading the paper, remus seems to be a good option to go with.
Regards, R J On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 10:41 PM, Mike McClurg <[email protected]>wrote: > [Dropping xen-users and xen-devel] > > On 26/09/11 16:58, R J wrote: > > Hello Mike, > > > > Thank you for suggestion. I would love to incorporate remus in xapi if > > thats possible. > > Remus as its inbuilt logic of detecting checkpoint failure and taking > > decisions accordingly. > > > > I think there is remus support for xen 3.4 > > > > What do you suggest as my next step ? > I don't know much more about Remus than you do, actually. I think I'd > probably try to figure out how it works on plain Xen first, and then > think about what things xapi would need to do in order to control its > functionality. > > If you get to the point where you'd like to hack on xapi, then you will > probably want to follow along with Project Kronos > (http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XAPI_on_debian). That's probably the > easiest way to build xapi, and it's how we want to encourage > contributors to develop code. Also, it works on Xen 4.1, which might be > better for Remus integration anyway. > > Mike >
_______________________________________________ xen-api mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-api
