>>> On 21.11.14 at 16:06, <wei.l...@citrix.com> wrote:
> --- a/tools/firmware/hvmloader/acpi/build.c
> +++ b/tools/firmware/hvmloader/acpi/build.c
> @@ -263,6 +263,38 @@ static struct acpi_20_srat *construct_srat(void)
> return srat;
> }
>
> +static struct acpi_20_slit *construct_slit(void)
> +{
> + struct acpi_20_slit *slit;
> + unsigned int num, size;
> + int i;
>[...]
> + for ( i = 0; i < num; i++ )
How can i be signed here when num is unsigned. Even without the
common desire to have variables that can't be negative declared
unsigned, inconsistencies like this should be avoided.
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
