>>> On 25.11.14 at 17:19, <boris.ostrov...@oracle.com> wrote: > On 11/25/2014 09:55 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: >> >>> Regardless, do you think that disabling VPMU for PVH is worth anyway? >> That depends on what (bad) consequences not doing so has. > > I haven't seen anything (besides VAPIC accesses) but I think it would be > prudent to prevent any VPMU activity from happening. I can see, for > example MSRs and APIC vector being written. All of which look benign on > the first sight but who knows...
Yeah, it's not really a problem to put it in (if Konrad agrees; remember that PVH is still experimental, and hence fixing bugs caused only by it may be out of scope at this point - in any event I think that if your patch is to go in, mine should too). Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
