On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 04:53:53PM +0100, Daniel Kiper wrote: > On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 01:36:20PM -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 04:16:28PM +0100, Daniel Kiper wrote: > > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Kiper <daniel.ki...@oracle.com> > > > > This usage scenario which I can see this being useful (and > > I've tripped over this) is when you rebuild a new version > > from the same repo. As in, this affects developers, but > > not end-users and not distros. But perhaps I am missing > > one scenario? > > > > As such I would lean towards deferring this (and the other > > two) to Xen 4.6. > > As I know Debian build system sometimes complain if make distclean > does not leave build tree in distclean state (read "state before > configure" != "state after distclean"). It means that from > distros point of view we should apply this patch. However, > other two are not required and we can deffer them to Xen 4.6.
Cc-ing Axel and Debian Xen Team. > > Daniel _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel