>>> On 01.12.14 at 16:33, <wei.l...@citrix.com> wrote:
> --- a/tools/firmware/hvmloader/acpi/build.c
> +++ b/tools/firmware/hvmloader/acpi/build.c
> @@ -263,6 +263,38 @@ static struct acpi_20_srat *construct_srat(void)
> return srat;
> }
>
> +static struct acpi_20_slit *construct_slit(void)
> +{
> + struct acpi_20_slit *slit;
> + unsigned int num, size;
> + int i;
unsigned int please. Plus similar coding style issues further down as in
the previous patch.
> @@ -415,6 +448,11 @@ static int construct_secondary_tables(unsigned long
> *table_ptrs,
> table_ptrs[nr_tables++] = (unsigned long)srat;
> else
> printf("Failed to build SRAT, skipping...\n");
> + slit = construct_slit();
> + if (srat)
DYM slit?
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
