On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 05:54:56PM +0000, Wei Liu wrote: [...] > + /* > + * PVH Fixme: XENFEAT_supervisor_mode_kernel has been reused in PVH with > a > + * different meaning.
Crap, I've forgot to remove this PVH fixme! [...] > diff --git a/xen/include/asm-x86/dom0_build.h > b/xen/include/asm-x86/dom0_build.h > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000000..2ba349e445 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/dom0_build.h > @@ -0,0 +1,32 @@ > +#ifndef _DOM0_BUILD_H_ > +#define _DOM0_BUILD_H_ > + > +#include <asm/setup.h> > + > +extern unsigned int dom0_memflags; > +extern cpumask_t dom0_cpus; > + > +unsigned long dom0_compute_nr_pages( > + struct domain *d, struct elf_dom_parms *parms, unsigned long initrd_len); > +struct vcpu *dom0_setup_vcpu(struct domain *d, unsigned int vcpu_id, > + unsigned int cpu); > +int dom0_setup_permissions(struct domain *d); > + > +int dom0_construct_pv( > + struct domain *d, > + const module_t *image, unsigned long image_headroom, > + module_t *initrd, > + void *(*bootstrap_map)(const module_t *), > + char *cmdline); Since this is kind of new code, could you fix the indentation of the prototypes? _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
