On 02/17/2015 01:25 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 4:20 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez
<mcg...@do-not-panic.com> wrote:
As it is per our agreed upon changes we can in theory enable a
XEN_PVHVM system without XEN_PV or XEN_PVH. If this is indeed
desirable this poses an issue at build time
And this also raises the question of whether or not we should make
XEN_PVHVM a user selectable option, right now it is a def_bool and is
therefore not human selectable. You can implicitly disable it by
disabling PCI for example though. If we want that to be exposed to the
user we can then enable some description of what that means, and the
user will then be able to read / select / enable XEN_PV., XEN_PVHVM,
XEN_PVH. Right now they'd only be able to select XEN_PV and/or
XEN_PVH, XEN_PVHVM is implicit.
I think making XEN_PVHVM user selectable is okay.
Juergen
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
