>>> On 04.04.17 at 17:30, <bhavesh.da...@oracle.com> wrote: >> Looks like you've mixed up commit message (everything up from this >> marker) and … >> > > Sorry about that! Since it’s been a while since I posted a git patch to a > mailing list, I had to figure out what the canonical format for an e-mail > with a patch was, such that I could have a more verbose description of the > problem followed by the usual git commit message. In the Documentation > directory of the mainline Linux kernel tree I thought this is what they were > recommending: > > <message-body-start> > You can put a longer, more verbose description of the problem and the patch > here. This section is not picked up by the tools committers use to extract > the patch out of the e-mail. > > - - - > Original git commit message, more concise, which will be used as the commit > message in git > Signed-off-by: > Reviewed-by: > - - - > diffstat > > diff > - - > git version > <message-body-end> > > Is that not correct?
That's not how we do things normally. You could have looked at a couple of patches sent by others... Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel