On Wed, 2017-04-05 at 00:54 -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > > > > On 04.04.17 at 19:23, <dario.faggi...@citrix.com> wrote: > > > > If I'm not mistaken, this is not in staging-4.6: > > > > f3d47501db2b7bb8dfd6a3c9710b7aff4b1fc55b > > xen: fix a (latent) cpupool-related race during domain destroy > > > > I can't be positive this is what's missing, but it's my best guess. > > :-) > > > > I also haven't tried backporting it, but I'm happy to. Let me know > > if I > > should. > > I think we could leave 4.6 alone in this regard, unless you see a > strong need for the fix there, or unless anyone's aware of > someone having actively encountered the problem there. > I agree. And no, I'm not aware of anyone having run into the issue on 4.6.x.
> Or in > other words - if you feel like making sure we know of all prereqs > (and providing backports if those won't apply as is), I'd happily > apply them, but I don't think you absolutely need to. > I actually tried backporting the above commit. It's not just a matter of cherry picking, but it's trivial. I could not test the result, though, because I can't build the tools from 4.6 with my gcc (6.3.0), without backporting some toolstack patches too. I can look into which ones are needed, but not right now. So I'm going to put this on hold. Thanks and Regards, Dario -- <<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
