Ping The Xen dom0 support in DPDK seems dead.
Reminder: Last time we talked about, it was because of a severe bug which is not fixed yet: http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-July/044207.html http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-July/044376.html The request (9 months ago) was to give more time for feedbacks: http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-July/044847.html 23/02/2017 09:49, Thomas Monjalon: > 2017-02-20 15:33, Joao Martins: > > On 02/17/2017 04:07 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 10:51:44PM +0100, Vincent JARDIN wrote: > > >> Le 16/02/2017 à 14:36, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk a écrit : > > >>>> Is it time now to officially remove Dom0 support? > > >>> So we do have an prototype implementation of netback but it is waiting > > >>> for review of xen-devel to the spec. > > >>> > > >>> And I believe the implementation does utilize some of the dom0 > > >>> parts of code in DPDK. > > >> > > >> Please, do you have URLs/pointers about it? It would be interesting to > > >> share > > >> it with DPDK community too. > > > > > > Joao, would it be possible to include an tarball of the patches? I know > > > they are no in the right state with the review of the staging > > > grants API - they are incompatible, but it may help folks to get > > > a feel for what DPDK APIs you used? > > OK, see attached - I should note that its a WIP as Konrad noted, but once > > the > > staging grants work is finished, the code would be improved to have it in > > better > > shape (as well as in feature parity) for a proper RFC [and adhering to the > > project coding style]. > > Excuse my ignorance on Xen. > Is xen-netback for Dom0? > Is the DPDK Dom0 support working and useful? _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel