On 08/05/17 13:39, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> On 08.05.17 at 14:23, <andrew.coop...@citrix.com> wrote: >> Overall, I expect that Xenolinux purposefully never asked for an >> interrupt gate (as Xen would have rejected that in the 32bit case), and >> this point was never considered at all when PVOps was developed, which >> followed Linux's normal expectation that int80 was an interrupt gate. > Yet I have a hard time seeing why 32-bit Linux needs it to be that > way.
I don't understand what you mean by this. Is it a counterpoint to my statement, or just an observation about the way Linux chooses to set things up? ~Andrew _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
