On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 09:11:48AM +0800, Zhongze Liu wrote:
> GCC 7.1.1 complains that several buffers passed to snprintf() in xenpmd
> and tools/ocmal/xc are too small to hold the largest possible resulting 
> string,
> which is calculated by adding up the maximum length of all the substrings.
> 
> The warnings are treated as errors by -Werror, and goes like this 
> (abbreviated):
> 
> xenpmd.c:94:36: error: ‘%s’ directive output may be truncated writing up to
> 255 bytes into a region of size 13 [-Werror=format-truncation=]
>      #define BATTERY_INFO_FILE_PATH "/proc/acpi/battery/%s/info"
>                                     ^
> xenpmd.c:113:13: note: ‘snprintf’ output between 25 and 280 bytes into a
> destination of size 32
> 
> xenpmd.c:95:37: error: ‘%s’ directive output may be truncated writing up to
> 255 bytes into a region of size 13 [-Werror=format-truncation=]
>      #define BATTERY_STATE_FILE_PATH "/proc/acpi/battery/%s/state"
>                                      ^
> xenpmd.c:116:13: note: ‘snprintf’ output between 26 and 281 bytes into a
> destination of size 32
> 
> xenctrl_stubs.c:65:15: error: ‘%s’ directive output may be truncated writing
> up to 1023 bytes into a region of size 252 [-Werror=format-truncation=]
>       "%d: %s: %s", error->code,
>                ^~
> xenctrl_stubs.c:64:4: note: ‘snprintf’ output 5 or more bytes (assuming 1028)
> into a destination of size 256
> 
> Enlarge the size of these buffers as suggested by the complier
> (and slightly rounded) to fix the warnings.
> 
> No functional changes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zhongze Liu <blacksk...@gmail.com>
> Acked-by: Wei Liu <wei.l...@citrix.com>

Applied.

Julien, consider this for 4.9?

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Reply via email to