On Wed, 2017-06-28 at 19:43 +0100, George Dunlap wrote: > On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 1:09 PM, Dario Faggioli > <dario.faggi...@citrix.com> wrote: > > Note that a cap is considered valid only if > > it is within the [1, nr_vcpus]% interval. > > Oh, I see you added the check here. > Yeah...
> Still, I think we should add a check in the hypervisor too. The > check > here should mainly be to give a reasonable error message; we > shouldn't > rely on it for safety. > ...sure, I totally agree. Will do. Dario -- <<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
