On 27/07/17 16:20, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 07/26/2017 07:56 AM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> This allows svm_{get,set}_segment_register() to access the user segments by
>> array index, capitalising on x86_seg_* matches the hardware encoding.
> This does read correctly to me, I think some sort of preposition is missing.
>
> "capitalising on x86_seg_* matches *in* the hardware encoding"? *of*?

Oops yes. "capitalising on the fact that the x86_seg_* values match the
hardware encodings."

>
>
>
>> While making this alteration, add some newlines for clarity, switch an int 
>> for
>> a bool, and make the functions fail safe in a release build, rather than
>> crashing Xen.
>>
>> Bloat-o-meter reports some modest improvements:
>>
>>   add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 0/2 up/down: 0/-130 (-130)
>>   function                                     old     new   delta
>>   svm_set_segment_register                     662     653      -9
>>   svm_get_segment_register                     409     288    -121
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.coop...@citrix.com>
> Reviewed-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrov...@oracle.com>

Thanks.

~Andrew

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Reply via email to