On Fri, 2015-02-27 at 13:46 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Fri, 2015-02-27 at 13:27 +0000, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> > After this series, vcpu_to_node() (defined in xen/include/xen/numa.h) is > > left with only one use, in xen/arch/arm/domain.c, besides of course > > being used to implement domain_to_node() (still in > > xen/include/xen/numa.h). > > > > So, provided ARM people (and I'm Cc-ing them) can get rid of that, > > Happy to do so if you have advise on what to replace it with, just 0? > As Julien says, with the MEMF_no_owner feature Jan is introducing in the series. > We don't do NUMA yet on ARM so that would be fine, but eventually we'd > want the vcpu stack to be allocated in some sort of "sensible relative > to vcpu affinity" location... > Yes, and Jan's MEMF_no_owner, if it works on your arch too, as it seems it could, will provide exactly that. Regards, Dario
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel