On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 04:42:42PM +0000, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 26.02.15 at 16:55, <wei.l...@citrix.com> wrote: > > Update NUMA_NO_NODE in Xen code to use the new macro. > > > > No functional change introduced. > > But also no explanation given why this is being done. After all just > leaving out the explicit specification on a node in the memop flags > has the effect of saying NUMA_NO_NODE. >
During last round review, Andrew wanted me to move this to Xen public header to avoid reinventing it in libxc. Now this value is used in libxc patch. But I don't particularly mind whether we move it or not, it's up to you maintainers to decide. Wei. > Jan > > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xen.org > http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
