On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 07:56:36AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 18.08.17 at 15:45, <wei.l...@citrix.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 01:45:50PM +0800, Chao Gao wrote: > >> > > >> >> > + } > >> >> > + } > >> >> > + } > >> >> > >> >> This still looks wrong to me. How do you know acpi_modules[0] is DMAR > >> >> table? > >> >> > >> > > >> >Oh, I sorta see why you do this, but I still think this is wrong. The > >> >DMAR should either be a new module or be joined to the existing one (and > >> >with all conflicts resolved). > >> > >> Hi, Wei > >> Thanks for your comments. > >> > >> iirc, HVM only supports one module; > > > > This is indeed how it is stated in various comments. I'm not sure why > > there is such restriction. Maybe x86 maintainers can shed more light on > > this? > > Not me, sorry. Maybe ask whoever has written that code? >
OK. I have misunderstood the restriction was from hvmloader. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
