On Thu, Aug 17, Olaf Hering wrote:

> Extend API for managing bitmaps. Each bitmap is now represented by a
> generic struct xc_sr_bitmap.

> +static inline bool xc_sr_bitmap_resize(struct xc_sr_bitmap *bm, unsigned 
> long bits)
> +static inline void xc_sr_bitmap_free(struct xc_sr_bitmap *bm)

> +static inline bool xc_sr_set_bit(unsigned long bit, struct xc_sr_bitmap *bm)
> +static inline bool xc_sr_test_bit(unsigned long bit, struct xc_sr_bitmap *bm)
> +static inline int xc_sr_test_and_clear_bit(unsigned long bit, struct 
> xc_sr_bitmap *bm)
> +static inline int xc_sr_test_and_set_bit(unsigned long bit, struct 
> xc_sr_bitmap *bm)

Any objection to remove the trailing '_bit' from these four function names?

Olaf

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Reply via email to