Hi Jan,
On 08/31/2017 10:04 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> On 30.08.17 at 20:32, <prosku...@sec.in.tum.de> wrote: >> We move the macros (MAX|INVALID)_ALTP2M out of x86-related code to >> common code, as the following patches will make use of them on ARM. > But both seem not impossible to be require arch-specific values. Right. The general idea at this point is to move as much of altp2m functionality/configuration as possible into a common place. Yet, if you believe that, e.g., the number of altp2m views could/should diverge between both architectures, I will gladly move the defines back into arch-related parts. However, we need to consider that while x86/Intel supports up to 512 entries for EPT pointers as part of the VMCS, we are quite flexible on ARM: we manage the views entirely in software and hence on ARM we can easily keep up with Intel's specification. This allows us to hold parts of the altp2m configuration in a unified place. Or do you believe this is not the right way to go? Thanks, ~Sergej _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
