On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 01:36:13PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 31/08/17 13:03, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>>> On 31.08.17 at 13:45, <wei.l...@citrix.com> wrote: > >> There is only one function gate_op_read that needs to be modified. > > I'm fine with it just being read() here, but I can see this being possibly > > controversial. Please double check that Andrew isn't entirely opposed > > to it. An alternative suggestion would then be read_mem(). > > I'm not opposed generally, but simply 'read' has a chance of angering > Coverity, because it has inbuilt models for most functions specified by > core standards like POSIX. > > read_mem() would be better. >
read_mem it is. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
