Revise xl tool use case by adding -e option
Remove work-conserving from TODO list
Signed-off-by: Meng Xu <men...@cis.upenn.edu>
---
Changes from v1
Revise rtds docs
---
docs/features/sched_rtds.pandoc | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/docs/features/sched_rtds.pandoc b/docs/features/sched_rtds.pandoc
index 354097b..d51b499 100644
--- a/docs/features/sched_rtds.pandoc
+++ b/docs/features/sched_rtds.pandoc
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ as follows:
It is possible, for a multiple vCPUs VM, to change the parameters of
each vCPU individually:
- * `xl sched-rtds -d vm-rt -v 0 -p 20000 -b 10000 -v 1 -p 45000 -b 12000`
+ * `xl sched-rtds -d vm-rt -v 0 -p 20000 -b 10000 -e 1 -v 1 -p 45000 -b
12000 -e 0`
# Technical details
@@ -53,7 +53,8 @@ the presence of the LIBXL\_HAVE\_SCHED\_RTDS symbol. The
ability of
specifying different scheduling parameters for each vcpu has been
introduced later, and is available if the following symbols are defined:
* `LIBXL\_HAVE\_VCPU\_SCHED\_PARAMS`,
- * `LIBXL\_HAVE\_SCHED\_RTDS\_VCPU\_PARAMS`.
+ * `LIBXL\_HAVE\_SCHED\_RTDS\_VCPU\_PARAMS`,
+ * `LIBXL\_HAVE\_SCHED\_RTDS\_VCPU\_EXTRA`.
# Limitations
@@ -95,7 +96,6 @@ at a macroscopic level), the following should be done:
# Areas for improvement
-* Work-conserving mode to be added;
* performance assessment, especially focusing on what level of real-time
behavior the scheduler enables.
@@ -118,4 +118,5 @@ at a macroscopic level), the following should be done:
Date Revision Version Notes
---------- -------- -------- -------------------------------------------
2016-10-14 1 Xen 4.8 Document written
+2017-08-31 2 Xen 4.10 Revise for work conserving feature
---------- -------- -------- -------------------------------------------
--
1.9.1
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
