On Wed, 2015-02-25 at 13:39 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote: > In RFC style, rather than relying on the implicit assumptions of a > particular C ABI. > > I have also confirmed, using the Python gdb extension technique in > [0], that the struct offsets (in a Linux binary at least) are the same > as described here. > > I took the opportunity to also confirm that x86_32, x86_64, arm32 and > arm64 are all the same. > > This highlighted that struct netif_rx_request was missing some > explicit padding, which is added here. > > Lastly, fixup some struct names to allow the generated docs to > properly hyperlink, mainly by adding the _t to type names where > appropriate, but also s/netif_tx_extra/netif_extra_info_t/. > > [0] > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9788679/how-to-get-the-relative-adress-of-a-field-in-a-structure-dump-c > > Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campb...@citrix.com> > Cc: Roger Pau Monné <roger....@citrix.com> > Acked-by: Wei Liu <wei.l...@citrix.com>
Applied, thanks. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
