On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 05:59:39PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Wei Liu, le Tue 03 Mar 2015 16:58:07 +0000, a écrit : > > Rump kernel doesn't use mini-os's fd management facility so there is no > > alloc_fd etc. On the other hand this makes me think number 1 is as good > > as any other number we can use. > > Does Rump have not fd at all? It'd probably still be good to have
AIUI it's using NetBSD's facility or it just doesn't care. The mini-os fork (!) in rump kernel doesn't have alloc_fd etc. > different, even if hardcoded, fd numbers, for potentially easier > debugging. Fair enough. I'm going to use ... 0xff (and probably comes with a #define in code). Wei. > > Samuel _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
