>>> On 26.09.17 at 10:16, <bhupinder.tha...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 26 September 2017 at 12:45, Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> wrote: >>>>> On 26.09.17 at 01:08, <bhupinder.tha...@linaro.org> wrote: >>> Yes, after including the __STRICT_ANSI__ check the headers.chk check >>> passes. But I had to include string header file (after suggestion from >>> Stefano) for fixing the headers++.chk. >> >> I'd like to have a more detailed explanation here - since the header >> passed the check without this prereq before, I'd prefer if the >> dependency was not added unconditionally. > > The C header passed the check without the prereq addition. However, > for C++ headers since > __STRICT_ANSI__ is not defined, it tries to expand the > DEFINE_XEN_FLEX_RING macro > and looks for declarations for size_t, memcpy() etc. To satisfy that > requirement, string header > file had to included similar to what was done for pvcalls.
Ah, yes. This should equally apply to the C99 check then. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
