> -----Original Message----- > From: Jan Beulich [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: 17 October 2017 13:53 > To: Paul Durrant <[email protected]> > Cc: Andrew Cooper <[email protected]>; George Dunlap > <[email protected]>; Ian Jackson <[email protected]>; Wei Liu > <[email protected]>; Stefano Stabellini <[email protected]>; xen- > [email protected]; KonradRzeszutek Wilk > <[email protected]>; Daniel de Graaf <[email protected]>; Tim > (Xen.org) <[email protected]> > Subject: RE: [PATCH v11 05/11] x86/mm: add HYPERVISOR_memory_op to > acquire guest resources > > >>> On 17.10.17 at 14:28, <[email protected]> wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- > >> > >> > --- a/xen/include/xsm/dummy.h > >> > +++ b/xen/include/xsm/dummy.h > >> > @@ -724,3 +724,9 @@ static XSM_INLINE int xsm_xen_version > >> (XSM_DEFAULT_ARG uint32_t op) > >> > return xsm_default_action(XSM_PRIV, current->domain, NULL); > >> > } > >> > } > >> > + > >> > +static XSM_INLINE int > xsm_domain_resource_map(XSM_DEFAULT_ARG > >> struct domain *d) > >> > +{ > >> > + XSM_ASSERT_ACTION(XSM_DM_PRIV); > >> > + return xsm_default_action(action, current->domain, d); > >> > +} > >> > >> Perhaps better place this near something similar/related (also for > >> some of the other additions further down)? > > > > Looking at this again it seems that various related things, e.g. > > domain_memory_map, are x86 only so adding at the end seems like the > best > > thing to do. > > Well, okay then (unless Daniel, whom it looks like you forgot to Cc, > has a better suggestion). >
Yes, I realised that I forgot to cc him in since the code was added. He's on the v12 list. Paul > Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
